MASSENA, N.Y. — It has been nearly eight years since the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but the fears and anxieties they gave rise to continue to take a toll on the design of public buildings. Even the words “United States,” it seems — when spelled out in the wrong size and color — can be an unacceptable security risk.

Border Sign; Dangerous
Border Sign; Dangerous

[ad name=”in-post”]

Security, while something we should strive to improve and maintain, is not always governed by people entirely in their right minds. The sign was apparently suddenly seen as a “security risk”, and from the horse’s mouth (the horse being Kelly Ivahnenko); “The sign could be a huge target and attract undue attention. Anything that would place our officers at risk we need to avoid.”

There is little logic in taking down that sign. If they’re really going to remove “anything that would place our officers at risk”, they would have to remove the border crossing. Actually, remove the border. Actually, why not just build a big friggin’ wall instead. That’d be better, wouldn’t it? No risk to the officers. No risk that pesky Canadians could come…do…some shenanigans?

Anyway. The NYTimes has a good closing remark;

They certainly put into question the thinking behind Customs and Border Protection’s decision. It is as if the government is attuned to architecture’s symbolic power, but unable to decipher its meanings.’

Also here.

About Author

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Privacy Settings
We use cookies to enhance your experience while using our website. If you are using our Services via a browser you can restrict, block or remove cookies through your web browser settings. We also use content and scripts from third parties that may use tracking technologies. You can selectively provide your consent below to allow such third party embeds. For complete information about the cookies we use, data we collect and how we process them, please check our Privacy Policy